Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
less than
1 minute
Read so far

Stat-Shot: Focused Family Planning Data at Your Fingertips

0 comments
Image
SummaryText

The RESPOND Project at EngenderHealth developed this tool on family planning (FP) statics from a secondary analysis of data from 40 demographic and health surveys (DHS) to explore the characteristics of users and nonusers of different FP methods. Indicators explored include parity, ideal number of children, wealth quintile, urban vs. rural location, and source of method, with methods categorised as traditional, short-acting, or long-acting and permanent.  The tool lists countries, indicators, display by table or "all data", and a help section with definitions, explanations, and variables.

The tool can be used for advocacy by highlighting disparities in method use and is designed to enable evidence-based decision making and priority setting among programme managers by identifying existing gaps in knowledge or underserved segments of the population to answer these questions, among others:

  • "What methods women use for spacing versus for limiting? Whether these method choices match their stated fertility intentions?
  • How the method mix differs between the wealthiest and the poorest women? Between urban and rural women?
  • Whether parity and ideal number of children differ among users of different types of methods?
  • If family planning users met or exceeded their desired parity? Whether this differs by type of method used?"

Funding is provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Publishers

Publication Date
Source

Press release from The RESPOND Project at EngenderHealth to The Communication Initiative on July 19 2012.